{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"B\u0131\u00e7ak Hukuk","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.bicakhukuk.com\/de\/","author_name":"B\u0131\u00e7ak Hukuk","author_url":"https:\/\/www.bicakhukuk.com\/de\/author\/yonetici\/","title":"A Comparative Study of the Problem of the Admissibility of Improperly Obtained Evidence %","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"iBzBpwmwWK\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.bicakhukuk.com\/de\/comparative-study-problem-admissibility-improperly-obtained-evidence\/\">A Comparative Study of the Problem of the Admissibility of Improperly Obtained Evidence<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.bicakhukuk.com\/de\/comparative-study-problem-admissibility-improperly-obtained-evidence\/embed\/#?secret=iBzBpwmwWK\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"&#8222;A Comparative Study of the Problem of the Admissibility of Improperly Obtained Evidence&#8220; &#8211; B\u0131\u00e7ak Hukuk\" data-secret=\"iBzBpwmwWK\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/* <![CDATA[ *\/\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/\/# sourceURL=https:\/\/www.bicakhukuk.com\/wp-includes\/js\/wp-embed.min.js\n\/* ]]> *\/\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.bicakhukuk.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/03\/evidence-storage-compact-shelving-spacesaver-shelves-that-move.jpg","thumbnail_width":1925,"thumbnail_height":1501,"description":"This thesis provides a comparative analysis of the rules governing the admissibility of improperly obtained evidence in Turkish and English law. The main objective is to consider how the issue in question can most appropriately be solved under the different legal circumstances of both countries and how the positive law of each country may benefit from each other on this particular problem."}